Tag Archives: featured

Unofficial Results: Three Votes Separate Hueston and Owenby

Three votes separate Mike Hueston and Lyle K. (Pete) Owenby in the Republican primary for Bourbon County Commissioner District 1, according to the unofficial results the Bourbon County Clerk’s office posted after Tuesday’s primary election. Countywide, 2,908 ballots were cast.

The race is too close to call, and none of these numbers are final. Provisional ballots are not included in the unofficial totals; the county Board of Canvassers decides which of them count and makes the results official at the canvass, which the Bourbon County Monitor reports is scheduled for Aug. 17. The Monitor also reported that County Clerk Susan Walker said the number of outstanding provisional ballots would be released Wednesday. Under a recent change in Kansas law, mailed advance ballots had to be in by 7 p.m. on Election Day to count. FortScott.biz published a step-by-step walkthrough of how the county counts, reconciles and canvasses ballots in June.

County Commissioner: unofficial totals

District 1, Republican

Candidate Votes Vote %
Mike Hueston 163 42.67%
Lyle K. (Pete) Owenby 160 41.88%
Lisa Dillon 59 15.45%

The nominee will appear on the November general election ballot with Clinton L. Walker of Mapleton, unopposed in the Democratic primary.

District 1, Democratic

Candidate Votes Vote %
Clinton L. Walker 88 100.00%

District 3, Republican

Candidate Votes Vote %
Joe Allen 307 65.60%
Josh Jones 161 34.40%

The results report lists Jones as Joshua Jones; he filed as Josh Jones. No Democrat filed for District 3; the Democratic primary line recorded six write-in votes.

District 4, Republican

Candidate Votes Vote %
Gregg Motley 427 100.00%

No Democrat filed for District 4; the Democratic line recorded 12 write-in votes.

Township clerk: unofficial totals

All township clerk candidates ran as Republicans; no Democrat filed for any township clerk office. Marion Township was the only contested race. In the county’s other townships no candidate filed, and those races recorded only scattered write-in votes.

Township Candidate Votes
Drywood Laura Krom 67
Marion Michael Ramsey 100
Marion Brent M. Smith 61
Scott Donald Banwart 438
Timberhill Jennifer Epting Williams 32

Contested precinct committee races: unofficial totals

Five Republican precinct committee races drew more than one candidate.

Race Candidate Votes
7th Ward Committeeman Robert S. Love 79
7th Ward Committeeman Michael Hoyt 73
Drywood Committeewoman Vickie Shead 67
Drywood Committeewoman Laura Krom 18
Marmaton D2 Committeeman Jeffrey L. Reed 68
Marmaton D2 Committeeman Micheal Bryant 23
Osage Committeeman Marvin Creager 47
Osage Committeeman Joshua Kee 22
Timberhill Committeeman Timothy H. Emerson Sr. 20
Timberhill Committeeman Brandon Whisenhunt 18

What happens next

The Board of Canvassers will review provisional ballots before certifying the official results. In a race as close as the District 1 Republican primary, those ballots could matter. FortScott.biz will report the official totals after the canvass.

The full unofficial report, “Statement of Votes Cast by Geography,” is posted on the Bourbon County website. It also includes Bourbon County’s votes in the federal, state and statewide-ballot-question primaries; those contests are decided by voters beyond Bourbon County, and the county’s numbers alone do not determine their outcomes.

Bourbon County Appraiser Matt Quick Resigns

Bourbon County Appraiser Matt Quick has resigned, with his last working day set for August 18. In a letter emailed to all five county commissioners Monday evening, Quick said he and his wife “have been presented with an exciting opportunity to embark on a new life adventure,” and called leaving the office “bittersweet.”

The letter, sent shortly after 5 p.m. on Monday, August 3, was addressed to the commission and copied to the County Clerk’s office, Treasurer Jennifer Hawkins, and the Register of Deeds.

The office he leaves. The county appraiser values all taxable real and personal property in Bourbon County each year, houses, farmland, commercial buildings, vehicles, and business equipment. Those valuations are the base on which the county, cities, school districts, and other taxing entities levy property taxes. Under Kansas law (K.S.A. 19-430), the appraiser is appointed by resolution of the county commission for a four-year term, and an appointee must have at least three years of mass appraisal experience and hold a state credential, either the Registered Mass Appraiser (RMA) designation Quick mentions in his letter, or a certified general real property appraiser’s license.

Quick’s letter counts eight years of service to the community. Commission records show he has led the office since July 2021, when commissioners named him interim county appraiser by Resolution 22-21; a Kansas Department of Revenue compliance reviewer praised his work before the commission that December, and his reappointment to a new four-year term came before the commission in the summer of 2025.

His departure is one of two from the office this month: Quick writes that his personal property manager is also leaving, with a last day of August 14. He notes that no state reports or analysis are due until October, which he says gives the commission time to find a replacement who can do their own analysis for the 2027 tax year, and that Matthew Booker, the county’s district representative with the state Property Valuation Division, will guide commissioners through candidates.

His letter follows in full.


Dear Commissioners,

After much thought and consideration, I am formally submitting my resignation as County Appraiser for Bourbon County, with my last working day being August 18, 2026.

Serving this community for the past eight years has been both an honor and a privilege. I am deeply grateful for the trust placed in me, the collaboration with dedicated colleagues, and the opportunity to contribute to the county’s growth and success.

My wife and I have been presented with an exciting opportunity to embark on a new life adventure, and while I am eager for what lies ahead, leaving this role and the people I’ve worked alongside is bittersweet.

I will be informing Matthew Booker who is our District Rep with Property Valuation Division with the state to let them know. They will be your guides for candidates to replace me as they must be an RMA with the state to qualify. My office will be self-sustainable for the next few months. There are no reports or analysis for the state that needs to be done until October. This will allow you to find a replacement and they will be able to do their own analysis for the 2027 tax year. My Personal Property manager is also leaving and last day will be on the 14th so they can find the right person for them in that position as well. My field appraisers Mike and Herb have been faithful hard-working employees that brave the elements and the people of Bourbon County and will continue to do their jobs at the highest level after I am gone. Janet my office manager has been with the county since 2008. She is a wealth of knowledge about running all aspects of the department and is a loyal and trustworthy employee. She will keep things running smoothly in my absence. I hope that the employees in my office will be treated with respect and dignity that long term dedicated assets that they deserve.

Thank you for the support, guidance, and friendship I have experienced during my tenure. Bourbon County will always hold a special place in my heart.

With sincere appreciation,

Matt Quick


The appraiser’s office is in the county courthouse at 210 S. National Ave. FortScott.biz will follow the commission’s search for a successor as it develops.

No Hearing and No New Case: State Has Yet to Refile Charges Against Commissioner Milburn-Kee

When the State dismissed its misdemeanor case against Bourbon County Commissioner Mika Milburn-Kee in late June, Senior Judge Merlin G. Wheeler’s order set Monday at 1 p.m. in Fort Scott for a first appearance and preliminary examination in the case the Kansas Attorney General’s office told the court it would refile. Five weeks later, no new case has been filed, and the Monday hearing, with no case to attach it to, never made it onto the court’s schedule.

Asked whether the hearing was going forward, the Bourbon County District Court clerk’s office replied by email Monday: “There is no hearing today. The case was dismissed.” Court staff confirmed by phone that nothing has been refiled and “there was nothing scheduled for today.”

At a June 26 pretrial conference, Senior Judge Merlin G. Wheeler denied the State’s eve-of-trial motion to add a felony Intimidation of Voters count to the two misdemeanors Milburn-Kee had faced since March. The State then dismissed the case without prejudice, telling the court it intended to refile all three charges together under a new case number. The judge’s written order, filed June 27, set the Aug. 3 date for the anticipated new case.

That case has not appeared. In Kansas district court records pulled Monday morning, a party search — run both for Bourbon County and statewide — shows no new case against Milburn-Kee. Nothing has been docketed in the dismissed case since the June 27 order. The Attorney General’s office, where Assistant Attorney General Olivia R. Higdon is prosecuting the case, has not publicly explained the delay. When FortScott.biz called the office July 27, a staff member said the only thing the office could share was that the matter was under “prosecutorial review.”

Whether and when the State will refile are open questions. One constraint is the calendar: Wheeler ordered that dismissing and refiling does not restart the speedy-trial clock, which he dated to April 15. Under Kansas’s speedy-trial law, K.S.A. 22-3402, a defendant who is out on bond must be brought to trial within 180 days of arraignment, not counting delays the defense causes — by that measure, roughly mid-October.

All of the charges stem from an Oct. 25, 2025 incident at the county commission room while it was being used as an early-voting polling place. The dismissed case charged interference with the conduct of public business, a Class A misdemeanor, and disorderly election conduct, a Class B misdemeanor that on conviction would mean forfeiture of office under K.S.A. 25-2432. The proposed third count, Intimidation of Voters, is a severity level 7 nonperson felony.

A charge is an accusation, not a finding of guilt, and Milburn-Kee, who has pleaded not guilty, is presumed innocent unless and until a jury decides otherwise. FortScott.biz will report when a new case is filed or a new hearing is set.

The Choice Is Yours: KS Primary Voting Is Tomorrow

The Bourbon County Courthouse, 210 S. National Avenue.

2026 Bourbon County Primary Election: Candidates and Ballot Question

The Bourbon County Clerk’s office released the official list of candidates and ballot question for the August 4, 2026 Primary Election.

Below is a complete breakdown of every race and the constitutional amendment question that Bourbon County voters will see on their ballots.


Democratic Primary Candidates

United States Senator

  • Damon Anderson – Shawnee
  • Christy Davis – Cottonwood Falls
  • Adam Hamilton – Stilwell
  • Jason Hart – Wichita
  • Kevin Latz – Mission Hills
  • Erik Murray – Kansas City
  • Sandy Spidel Neumann – Overland Park
  • Anne Parelkar – Overland Park
  • Patrick C. Schmidt – Topeka
  • Michael “Mike” Soetaert – Wellington
  • Noah Taylor – Kechi

U.S. House of Representatives – District 2

  • Don Coover – Galesburg

Kansas Governor / Lt. Governor

  • Ethan Corson / Renee Duxler – Salina
  • Cindy Holscher / KC Ohaebosim – Wichita
  • Curt Skoog / Jennifer Bacani McKenney – Fredonia

Kansas Secretary of State

  • Jennifer Day – Overland Park
  • Samuel Lane – Shawnee

Kansas Attorney General

  • Chris Mann – Lawrence

Kansas State Treasurer

  • Juan C. Luengo – Olathe

Commissioner of Insurance

  • Dinah Sykes – Lenexa

State Board of Education – District 9

  • Heather Guernsey – Chanute

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 1

  • Clinton L. Walker – Mapleton

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 3

  • No candidate filed

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 4

  • No candidate filed

Township Clerk (Democratic)

No candidates filed in Drywood, Franklin, Freedom, Marion, Millcreek, Marmaton, Osage, Pawnee, Scott, Timberhill, or Walnut townships.

Democratic Precinct Committeeman/Committeewoman

Precinct Position Candidate
7th Ward Committeewoman Tracy J. Schafer – Fort Scott
Marmaton D2 Committeewoman Thelma J. Quirin – Redfield
Millcreek Committeewoman Jane L. Gaines – Fort Scott
Scott D4 Committeewoman Carol K. Lydic – Fort Scott
Timberhill Committeeman Clinton Lee Walker – Mapleton
Timberhill Committeewoman Rachel Walker – Mapleton
All other Democratic precinct positions: No candidate filed

Republican Primary Candidates

United States Senator

  • Roger Marshall – St. John
  • Pond Naramore – Lawrence

U.S. House of Representatives – District 2

  • Derek Schmidt – Independence
  • Chad E. Young – Lawrence

Kansas Governor / Lt. Governor

  • Ty Masterson / Jeffrey Klemp – Lansing
  • Charlotte O’Hara / Michelle Dombrosky – Olathe
  • Nick Reinecker / Katy Reinecker – Inman
  • Stacy L. Rogers / Michael W. Smith – Lansing
  • Philip Sarnecki / Joy Eakins – Wichita
  • Vicki Schmidt / Joe Newland – Neodesha
  • Scott Schwab / Ken Rahjes – Agra

Kansas Secretary of State

  • Pat Proctor – Leavenworth

Kansas Attorney General

  • Kris Kobach – Lecompton

Kansas State Treasurer

  • Steven Johnson – Assaria

Commissioner of Insurance

  • Daniel Hawkins – Wichita

Kansas House of Representatives – District 4

  • Rick James – La Cygne

State Board of Education – District 9

  • Destry Brown – Fort Scott
  • Kristian Gerken – Paola
  • Renee Slinkard – Parker

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 1

  • Lyle K. (Pete) Owenby – Redfield
  • Mike Hueston – Mapleton
  • Lisa Dillon – Fort Scott

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 3

  • Joe Allen – Fort Scott
  • Josh Jones – Fort Scott

Bourbon County Commissioner – District 4

  • Gregg Motley – Fort Scott

Township Clerk (Republican)

  • Drywood: Laura Krom
  • Franklin: No candidate filed
  • Freedom: No candidate filed
  • Marion: Brent M. Smith; Michael Ramsey
  • Millcreek: No candidate filed
  • Marmaton: No candidate filed
  • Osage: No candidate filed
  • Pawnee: No candidate filed
  • Scott: Donald Banwart
  • Timberhill: Jennifer Epting Williams
  • Walnut: No candidate filed

Republican Precinct Committeeman/Committeewoman

Precinct Position Candidate(s)
1st Ward Committeeman Kevin W. Davidson
1st Ward Committeewoman Cheryl L. Adamson
2nd Ward Committeeman Robert J. Uhler
2nd Ward Committeewoman Laurie R. Uhler
3rd Ward Committeeman Brian Rhoades
3rd Ward Committeewoman Brandy L. Rhoades
4th Ward Committeeman Matthew Wells
4th Ward Committeewoman Katie Wells
5th Ward Committeeman No candidate filed
5th Ward Committeewoman Jana R. Walker
6th Ward Committeeman Douglas E. Niemeir
6th Ward Committeewoman No candidate filed
7th Ward Committeeman Michael Hoyt; Robert S. Love
7th Ward Committeewoman Patricia S. Love
Drywood Committeeman Larry Shead
Drywood Committeewoman Vickie Shead; Laura Krom
Franklin Committeeman Tony Bradbury
Franklin Committeewoman Kaitlyn Bradbury
Freedom D1 Committeeman No candidate filed
Freedom D1 Committeewoman Janice Seested
Freedom D5 Committeeman Lawrence Paddock
Freedom D5 Committeewoman Karen A. Paddock
Marion Committeeman No candidate filed
Marion Committeewoman Nancy Holt
Marmaton D2 Committeeman Jeffrey L. Reed; Micheal Bryant
Marmaton D2 Committeewoman Angela Soetaert
Marmaton D4 Committeeman No candidate filed
Marmaton D4 Committeewoman No candidate filed
Millcreek Committeeman Boa Casper
Millcreek Committeewoman Katie K. Casper
Osage Committeeman Joshua Kee; Marvin Creager
Osage Committeewoman Mika Milburn-Kee
Pawnee Committeeman Kevin Wagner
Pawnee Committeewoman Rachel Wagner
Scott D1 Committeeman Jim Sackett
Scott D1 Committeewoman Gayle Sackett
Scott D2 Committeeman Bryan Holt
Scott D2 Committeewoman Tara Holt
Scott D3 Committeeman Luke Demko
Scott D3 Committeewoman No candidate filed
Scott D4 Committeeman Roy D. Dare
Scott D4 Committeewoman Anne Dare
Scott D5 Committeeman Bill Lalman
Scott D5 Committeewoman Glenda Lalman
Timberhill Committeeman Timothy H. Emerson Sr.; Brandon Whisenhunt
Timberhill Committeewoman Rebecca Whisenhunt
Walnut Committeeman Jason Sutterby
Walnut Committeewoman Rebecca Sutterby

Constitutional Amendment Question

In addition to candidate races, voters will be asked to decide on a proposed constitutional amendment regarding how Kansas Supreme Court justices are selected.

Explanatory Statement

This amendment gives voters the right to elect the justices of the Kansas Supreme Court. The justices shall serve terms of six years, with elections of justice positions 1, 2 and 3 to occur in 2028, positions 4 and 5 to occur in 2030, and positions 6 and 7 to occur in 2032, and every six years thereafter. The rules applicable for such elections and the designation of position numbers shall be provided by law. Any vacancy on the court for an unexpired term shall be filled at an election as provided by law.

A vote FOR this proposition would give Kansas citizens the right to elect Kansas Supreme Court justices as provided by law. Justices will hold office for terms of six years. The Kansas Supreme Court nominating commission, whose membership consists of a majority of lawyers, would be abolished.

A vote AGAINST this proposition would continue the current system in which the Kansas Supreme Court nominating commission, whose membership consists of a majority of lawyers, provides the governor a list of three individuals to choose from for vacancies on the Kansas Supreme Court. Justices hold office for a term of six years and retain their offices if they win a retention election in which they do not face an opponent.

Proposed Amendment Text (§ 5 – Selection of Justices of the Supreme Court)

The citizens of Kansas who are qualified electors shall elect the justices of the supreme court. The rules applicable for such elections and the designation of position numbers shall be provided by law. Justice positions 1, 2 and 3 shall be elected at the general election in November of 2028, justice positions 4 and 5 in November of 2030 and justice positions 6 and 7 in November of 2032, and every six years thereafter, respectively. Any vacancy occurring on the supreme court for an unexpired term shall be filled by election as provided by law.

The full text of the amendment, including proposed changes to §§ 8 and 15 of the Kansas Constitution, is available in the attached ballot PDF.

Source: Bourbon County Clerk’s Office.

Documents:

The Virus Named for Bourbon County

Late in the spring of 2014, a Bourbon County man was working outdoors on his property. He picked up several tick bites and found one tick on his shoulder swollen with blood.

Within a few days he felt sick to his stomach and weak, with diarrhea. A fever came the next day. On the third day he saw his primary care doctor, who prescribed doxycycline, the standard antibiotic for a suspected tick-borne illness.

The next morning his wife found him barely conscious. An ambulance took him to a local hospital, where doctors started intravenous fluids and intravenous doxycycline and kept testing him. Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis: they were all negative. He kept getting worse, and on the eighth day they moved him again, this time to the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City (Mitchell et al., Case Reports in Infectious Diseases, 2026), for what the 2015 report calls further evaluation and management. Two days after that he was in intensive care.

Nobody ignored his symptoms. As he failed to improve, his doctors escalated at every step: from a clinic to a local hospital to a tertiary care center in five days. They ruled out the treatable causes before transferring him.

Every test for the tick-borne illnesses anyone knew about came back negative. Two days before he died, doctors sent a sample of his blood to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lab in Fort Collins, Colorado.

Eleven days after his first symptom, he died of septic shock. His blood pressure had fallen past what three separate drugs could hold up, and his organs were shutting down (Kosoy et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2015). Scientists at that CDC lab went on to find a virus never before seen in a sick person in this country.

They named it for the county the man came from. Bourbon virus.

Why the antibiotic did not work

Here is the part worth remembering. Doxycycline is an antibiotic, and antibiotics kill bacteria. They do nothing at all to a virus.

Kansas has numerous bacterial tick diseases, including Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichiosis, and tularemia. Doxycycline is the standard first-line treatment for a suspected bacterial tick illness. Bourbon virus is not bacterial, and that one difference explains most of what makes this disease dangerous.

When the CDC announced the discovery in February 2015, it said this was the first virus of its kind ever shown to make a person sick in the United States.

It comes from the lone star tick

Bourbon virus is believed to spread through the bite of an infected tick, and every known case has followed one. The only species ever confirmed to carry it is the lone star tick, identifiable by the small white dot on the female’s back. A 2023 review of the research notes that in the five cases known at that point, the species of the tick that bit each patient was never identified.

This is not a rare or exotic tick. In a 2024 advisory, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment called the lone star tick the most common tick in Kansas, living across at least the eastern two-thirds of the state and biting people aggressively.

Scientists have also found the virus in ticks collected in the wild. A CDC team tested more than 39,000 ticks collected in northwestern Missouri in 2013 and found live Bourbon virus in three batches, all of them lone star ticks (Savage et al., 2017).

The second death, also in Bourbon County

In the spring of 2024, a 63-year-old man with well-controlled diabetes was preparing hunting ground in the woods of Bourbon County. He pulled two small ticks off himself that day and found a third on his lower back two days later. None of them were swollen with blood.

A week later he nearly fainted while standing, and went to an urgent care clinic with a headache, sore muscles, no appetite, and swollen legs. His blood pressure was 67 over 54.

He reached intensive care already in multi-organ failure. Within four hours he was on maximum doses of four separate drugs to hold his blood pressure up. His kidneys gave out and he went on continuous dialysis, then onto a machine that takes over the work of the heart and lungs. They gave him doxycycline early, in case this was bacterial. It was not. CDC testing came back positive for Bourbon virus.

Late in his stay he developed a fungal pneumonia, which his doctors linked to the steroids used to fight the shock. He died on his 21st day in the hospital. The report lists that infection alongside the virus as what killed him.

His case was written up by KU Medical Center doctors and published in January 2026 (Mitchell et al., Case Reports in Infectious Diseases). The same report notes that the 2014 patient died at that hospital too. In a June 2024 advisory, state health officials wrote: “This year alone, KDHE has investigated several tickborne disease cases with severe health outcomes, including hospitalizations due to Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Tularemia, and a fatal case of Bourbon virus.”

A search of the FortScott.Biz archive found no local news coverage of this death at the time.

Two men have died of this virus after picking up ticks in Bourbon County. Their deaths were ten years apart, both at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City.

The virus is in ticks here

After his diagnosis, the state health department surveyed the man’s land.

They collected 1,253 ticks, and every single one was a lone star tick. Tested in batches, one batch came back positive for Bourbon virus, and eleven came back positive for Heartland virus, an unrelated tick-borne virus spread by the same tick, which causes a similar illness and also has no cure.

That is a finding from 2024, not a footnote from 2014. The virus remains uncommon, though. Earlier CDC surveys near Bourbon County estimated roughly 0.25 to 0.32 infections per 1,000 adult ticks, and a 2016 survey found none at all.

Map of states where Bourbon virus has been found.
Where Bourbon virus has turned up. Map: FortScott.Biz. Case data as of August 1, 2026.

How rare is it, really

Six human cases have been reported in the medical literature since 2014, in four states: Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, and New York. That count comes from the January 2026 case report. The CDC’s own page, updated in June 2026, gives no running total at all.

One of the Missouri cases was a state park official whose death was linked to Bourbon virus in a March 2018 report by The Missourian, a Franklin County newspaper. That case is documented in news coverage rather than in the medical journals, and the 2023 scientific review of the virus cites the newspaper account rather than a case report.

The researchers who study it say the real number is higher. There is no commercial test for Bourbon virus, so a doctor who suspects it has to send samples through the state and then to the CDC. The Stony Brook team notes that many clinicians are unfamiliar with the virus, which raises the chance of a missed diagnosis.

When researchers went looking in stored blood samples in North Carolina, they found four people out of 518 carrying antibodies showing they had been infected at some point (Zychowski et al., 2024). That state has never had a confirmed case.

That does not mean those people got seriously ill, and some infections are probably mild. It does mean the virus reaches more people than the case count shows.

Long Island doctors reported the same kind of finding this summer. They rechecked blood from 107 patients who had a fever after a tick bite between 2019 and 2024, and two carried Bourbon virus antibodies (Bateman et al., American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2026). One of them was New York’s first confirmed case, identified in April, a patient who had been hospitalized and assumed to have Lyme disease (Stony Brook Medicine, July 2026). Fox Weather reported that the patient recovered.

What to do about it

There is no vaccine and no drug that treats Bourbon virus. Hospitals can give fluids and treat the pain and fever, but they cannot kill the virus.

Since there is no treatment, not getting bitten is the only defense. The advice is the same as for every other tick illness. Treat clothes and boots with permethrin. Use a repellent with DEET, picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus, or IR3535. Tuck your pants into your socks. Shower soon after you come in. Then do a real tick check: waistband, armpits, around the ears, belly button, behind the knees, and in your hair. Check the dog too. Pull an attached tick straight out with fine-tipped tweezers, gripping close to the skin.

If you are being treated for a tick bite and not improving, tell your healthcare provider. That failure to improve is the specific clue Kansas health officials tell doctors to watch for.

Kansas health officials tell doctors to consider testing for Bourbon and Heartland viruses when a patient has a fever, a possible tick bite in the last three weeks, certain abnormal blood counts, and an illness that is not responding to doxycycline. Both Bourbon County men were given it. So was the New York patient, who was first thought to have Lyme disease.

The state also says to watch for symptoms for 30 days after a tick bite, and to tell your doctor about the bite. Kansas doctors who want testing help can call the state Epi Hotline at 877-427-7317, option 5.


Sources

Top photo: Sam Droege, USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (public domain). Map by FortScott.Biz.

Businesses Are Offering 9.65% Sales-Tax Discount in Fort Scott This Weekend

Submitted graphics.

 

The Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce has 14 businesses involved in this year’s Shop Fort Scott Sales- Tax Holiday event this weekend, August 7-8.

Lindsay Madison is the executive director of the Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce. Submitted photo.

Lindsay Madison, Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce  Executive Director, said the annual event began in 2011, when a few stores approached the Chamber with the idea.

The neighboring states of Missouri and Oklahoma have tax holidays before the fall season each year. Kansas has none.

So, to keep the community and their dollars in Fort Scott, some local businesses are providing the opportunity to save money, while supporting local businesses with an almost 10 percent reduction in their total receipts.

Some retailers will participate in the Shop Fort Scott Sales Tax Holiday Weekend by offering shoppers a 9.65% discount while continuing to collect and remit all applicable sales tax.

Participating merchants include 110 South Main Mercantile, Barbed Wire & Roses, Be The Light Boutique, Better In Bourbon, Blissful Meadows Boutique, Eternal Grace Boutique, Hedgehog Books, Laree + Co., Midwest Runway, Papa Don’s Pizza, Ruddick’s Furniture, Shirt Shack, Sunshine Boutique, and The Market at 23 Main.

Special considerations include that the discount at Ruddick’s Furniture applies to the first $500 of a purchase, while the discount at The Market at 23 Main applies to apparel only, according to a Chamber press release.

Shoppers may also enter to win $50 in Chamber Bucks.

To qualify for the Chamber Bucks, shoppers must spend at least $5 at three participating businesses and have their event rack card marked at each location. Completed cards should be turned in at the third participating business visited to be entered into the drawing.

Participating businesses offer a wide variety of merchandise, including apparel, home décor, new and repurposed furniture, school supplies, pizza, and much more.

With most participating businesses located in Fort Scott’s Downtown Historic District, shoppers can enjoy a convenient weekend of shopping while supporting local businesses throughout the community, according to the press release.

For more information, contact the Chamber at (620) 223-3566 or visit fortscott.com.

Leslie Godden from her email signature

“We are always looking for new ideas and ways to change things up so the event stays fresh and people continue to get excited about shopping locally,” said Leslie Godden, Chamber Communications and Events Planner.

The city bought the golf course with donated money. Is it self sufficient?

Fort Scott’s budget consultant told commissioners at last week’s work session that the city’s golf course does not cover its own costs, and questioned whether the way the city runs it now is sustainable.

“The revenues that we’re generating is not going to cover the expenses,” Baker Tilly financial advisor Ben Hart told commissioners on July 27, suggesting Woodland Hills might belong back inside the general fund. (watch)

The city’s own monthly reports put numbers to it. Twice last year the general fund transferred money into the golf fund to cover its losses: $142,135.64 in September 2025 and $59,630.23 in December, $201,765.87 together. Strip those transfers out and Woodland Hills ran roughly $77,400 in the red over the eight months from May through December 2025. Through June 2026, the latest month the city has reported, the fund is down about another $44,100, with no transfer so far this year. June was its best month in a year, a $16,299 surplus.

In April, Hart told commissioners the general fund ran a deficit of roughly $987,000 in 2025, driven largely by about $476,000 in transfers out to the golf course, economic development, and parks and recreation. Of those three, the golf course took the most. Over the same eight months the city’s reports show $201,766 going to golf, $147,179 to economic development and $35,566 to recreation.

Grouped bar chart comparing what Fort Scott's Woodland Hills golf course earned against what it cost to run, by month, May 2025 through June 2026. Cost exceeds earnings in 11 of the 14 months. Earnings peak near 82,000 dollars in May 2025 and fall to about 4,700 dollars in January 2026. Annotations mark two general fund transfers, 142,000 dollars in September 2025 and 60,000 dollars in December 2025.
The gap between the bars is the loss. Cost ran ahead of income in 11 of these 14 months. Source: City of Fort Scott Monthly Activity Reports, Fund 219, filed with the May 19 and July 21, 2026 agendas.

How Fort Scott ended up owning a golf course

The city didn’t set out to be in the golf business.

When Dave Martin became city manager in 2010, people started telling him the city should buy the course before it fell apart. Others told him to stay well clear of it. The owners could no longer keep it up, and nobody else stepped forward.

Martin’s answer was to put it to the town: if residents thought the city should own it, residents should help pay for it. They did. The community raised about $350,000 toward buying and fixing up the course.

“This is what a community can do when they set their sights to work together to make something nice and better in Fort Scott,” Martin said in 2016.

The years that followed brought steady investment. The city hired PGA professional Shannon O’Neil as clubhouse manager and a superintendent, Jon Kindlesparger, to rebuild grounds Martin admitted were “in disrepair.” A new clubhouse opened in February 2016. A $65,000 cart barn went up in 2018, again paid for largely by donations. In 2019 the city’s community development director, Robert Uhler, told a chamber coffee that a bestthingsks.com list had put Woodland Hills among the top ten public golf courses in Kansas.

The course became more than a place to golf. Fort Scott High School, Uniontown High School and Fort Scott Community College teams all played there, and in FSCC’s first year with a golf program two players qualified for nationals. By 2018 the course carried 127 memberships, hosted 25 tournaments a year and logged 9,100 rounds. In 2024 the clubhouse was renamed “The Clubhouse” by public vote, got new carts and furniture, and the city floated a Fort Scott-themed miniature golf course to pull families in.

So does it make money?

Two of the city’s own officials say they had heard for years that it did. That assumption is exactly what the city set out to test, by pulling the course out of the general fund and into a fund of its own, so its revenue and costs could be seen on their own.

Mayor Kathryn Salsbury told the July 27 work session she wants it kept that way. She said she had always heard the “golf course is the only place where we make money. And then we pulled out and found out that’s not true. So I’d kind of like to keep watching it.” (watch)

City Manager Brad Matkin backed her up, saying the old claim never had evidence behind it: “when I first started, it was like we made money. And that was a statement. You didn’t have any, there’s no proof to that.” (watch) Breaking it out, he said, was the only way to find out: “because other than that, you’re just saying things.”

Commissioner Julie Buchta raised a complication worth remembering: when the course did appear to turn a profit, it may have been because maintenance was being deferred. “Didn’t we show a profit, but it’s because basically they were cutting all the fertilizer and everything out?” (watch) A golf course that stops buying fertilizer looks cheaper for a season and worse for years, which is roughly the condition the city bought it in.

The shape of the problem

The chart above shows why this is hard to fix. Woodland Hills earns real money, about $351,000 from May to December 2025, but it earns almost all of it in five months: May alone brought in $82,000 and January brought in $4,748. The cost of running the course does not follow that curve. It ran between $34,000 and $82,000 every single month, summer and winter alike, and over those same eight months the city’s own reports put the cost of running the course at $428,804 against $351,385 of income. The fund’s expense lines run from salaries, health insurance and KPERS through electricity, equipment and irrigation maintenance to fertilizer, chemicals, sand and gravel. The 2026 budget had to add money for fertilizer and chemicals as prices rose.

The city has kept putting money in, and has looked for more out. In February commissioners raised what tournaments pay. Groups booking an event are charged per player, and the city caps what any single event pays for the day: the per-player fee went from $30 to $35, and the cap on one day’s tournament from $4,500 to $7,000. Those terms sit on the city’s golf event application rather than the published green-fee rates, so most golfers never see them; the change falls on the large charity and fundraiser tournaments the course hosts; as of 2018 it held about 25 a year. On July 21 they took $31,000 out of general fund reserves for a used 2021 Ventrac mower, after the 2012 machine failed and its parts were discontinued.

And the 2027 budget now in front of the commission sets aside nothing to cover golf course losses — only the annual golf cart lease. “There’s nothing budgeted here to transfer over for any kind of losses in the golf course,” Hart said. (watch)

Which leaves an unanswered question on the table as budget hearings approach: if the course again spends more than it takes in during 2027, where does that money come from? Hart said he and a Baker Tilly colleague would start producing a running profit-and-loss statement for the course so commissioners can follow it line by line.

The next budget work session is August 18. The public hearing and adoption are set for September 15.

Reporting from the city’s published recordings of its July 21 and July 27, 2026 commission meetings, the 2027 budget presentation filed with the July 27 agenda, the city’s Monthly Activity Reports for Fund 219 filed with the May 19 and July 21, 2026 agendas, and fortscott.biz coverage from 2016 to 2024.

Fort Scott’s 2027 budget: flat tax rate, but a one-time land sale props up the balance

Fort Scott’s city commission spent about 35 minutes on Monday, July 27, on a proposed 2027 budget that closes a projected shortfall: on paper, it balances. How it balances is what commissioners kept circling back to.

According to the budget presentation filed with the meeting agenda, the plan holds the general fund levy flat at 35.023 mills — the largest piece of a city property tax rate that totalled 43.382 mills in the 2026 budget and moves the general fund from a projected $231,000 deficit to a $40,000 surplus. It gets there partly through belt-tightening — holding two police positions and one fire position vacant, and limiting capital purchases — and partly by applying $500,000 it hopes to raise from selling lake lots to debt — which the city scores as $134,733 of recurring relief a year, not as $500,000 of operating money. It also funds a 3% wage increase and absorbs a 15% jump in health insurance.

City of Fort Scott Budget Highlights slide listing 2027 budget development highlights: maintain 35.023 mill levy; improve General Fund from a 231 thousand dollar deficit to a 40 thousand dollar surplus; apply 500 thousand dollars of lake lot sale proceeds to debt reduction; hold 2 police and 1 fire position vacant; limit capital purchases and focus on core services; fund a 3 percent wage adjustment and absorb a 15 percent health insurance increase.
The plan in the city’s own words. Source: City of Fort Scott 2027 budget presentation, filed with the July 27 agenda.

That $500,000 is money the city only gets once, and Baker Tilly financial advisor Ben Hart, who presented the budget, was direct about why he wants it spent on debt rather than daily operations.

The thinking behind the lake lots, he told commissioners, is that the money has to go to retiring debt — it cannot pay for day-to-day operations. “It’s also a one-time revenue source. And that’s it. You only get it once. You match that up with a one-time expense that would benefit the general fund, what that does is eliminate $134,000 in debt service payments out of the general fund.” (watch)

City Manager Brad Matkin said the lots are already surveyed: “The lake lots that he’s talking about are the five that have already been staked out. … It’s on the east side at the very end, be the north end.” (watch)

City of Fort Scott slide titled One-Time Financial Actions showing a four-step flow: 500 thousand dollars from lake lot sales, used to retire fire pumper and ladder truck debt, producing 134,733 dollars of estimated annual debt service reduction, described as recurring relief that turns one-time revenue into ongoing budget capacity.
The city’s own diagram of the plan: a one-time $500,000 land sale retires fire truck debt, which the city says cuts debt service by $134,733 every year. Source: City of Fort Scott 2027 budget presentation.

What if the lots don’t sell

Mayor Kathryn Salsbury asked the obvious question: “What if we don’t sell any lots like that?” (watch)

Hart said the city would fall back on money coming from Bourbon County for dispatch services — using part of that payment to cover the shortfall. Earlier he had said that would have to “take place for the next three or four years” (watch) (watch), for as long as the debt is outstanding.

That county payment isn’t in the budget at all. “Keep in mind, what we try to do is keep the dispatch payment from the county out of the general fund entirely,” Hart said. “Right now it’s not accounted for anywhere in the 27 budget.” (watch)

It also isn’t spare change. Hart described it as “reserved for future, well, really economic development,” pointing to the rodeo initiative the commission had announced as the sort of thing that might offset falling sales tax. (watch) So if the lake lots don’t sell, the trade-off isn’t free: money the city has been holding for possible future economic-development priorities would go to old debt instead.

Commissioner Julie Buchta pushed on whether early payoff actually saves anything. “What are we paying in interest? I mean, if we pay off those debts, are we trying to remember what our interest rate is?” she asked. (watch) Hart said the two trucks involved — a fire pumper and a ladder truck, according to the presentation — are near the end of their payment schedules, so the interest avoided would be roughly $75,000 in total over the remaining term. That is a separate figure from the recurring saving: the city puts the annual debt service reduction at $134,733 a year.

The other flashpoint was the municipal golf course, which the city pulled into its own fund to see whether it makes money. It doesn’t, and the 2027 budget sets aside nothing to cover its losses — only the annual golf cart lease (watch). We will look at the golf course, and how Fort Scott came to own it, in a separate story.

City of Fort Scott General Fund Snapshot slide with two pie charts. Revenues: property taxes 33 percent, sales taxes 30 percent, franchise taxes 14 percent, all other 23 percent. Expenses: personnel services 69 percent, contractual services 17 percent, debt service 7 percent, commodities 6 percent, capital outlay 1 percent, miscellaneous 0 percent.
Where general fund money comes from, and where it goes. Source: City of Fort Scott 2027 budget presentation.

Where the money comes from

Per the presentation, about 33% of general fund revenue is property tax and about 30% is sales tax, with franchise taxes at 14%. Personnel is roughly 69% of general fund spending — Fort Scott is, as Hart described it, a “service driven industry.” The plan assumes sales tax falls about $118,930 and franchise taxes about $134,944, including roughly $75,000 less in electric franchise tax.

The general fund should end the year with about $1.2 million in reserve — around 17.7% of spending, or about 65 days of operating money. “That’s if all revenue stopped and ceased to exist,” Hart said, “you’d have 65 days operating reserve to continue to maintain services.” (watch)

What’s next

Commissioners asked for a 2026 year-end forecast, a list of contractual services above about $10,000, and a clearer comparison of paying cash versus borrowing. Hart reminded them the choices are theirs. “This is the city administrator’s budget. You come up with what priorities look like. Our job is to set them up for you and give you the data necessary to make that decision.” (watch)

The budget calendar filed with the agenda sets the next work session for August 18, with the public hearing and adoption on September 15.

Based on the city’s published recording of the July 27, 2026 budget work session and the budget presentation filed with that meeting’s agenda. 

Fort Scott’s dialysis clinic: Reopening is still in the works

Late in 2025 the Fort Scott City Commission approved a property tax break of up to ten years for the vacant dialysis clinic at 2526 S. Main, to help a Joplin kidney specialist reopen it. Fort Scott has had no dialysis center since 2019. Patients drive to Pittsburg or Chanute, three times a week.

This week, FortScott.biz checked with those involved. City officials say their part is finished. The commission awarded the abatement, the bond paperwork is complete, and nothing more is pending at City Hall. The reopening is now in the hands of the physician who will run the clinic.

The building itself is quiet for now. A July 25 visit found no signage or activity yet, and county records show the property’s 2025 tax bill of $65,343.80 was paid in full. That fits the timeline in the city’s documents, which say the exemption cannot appear before the 2026 tax statement.

Where the building is

Most people know it as the low brick building in front of Walmart.

Map showing 2526 S. Main between the Walmart Supercenter parking lot and South Main Street in Fort Scott
2526 S. Main sits between the Walmart Supercenter parking lot and South Main Street (US 69/K-7). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.
The entrance canopy at 2526 S. Main with the Fort Scott Walmart Supercenter behind it
The building sits directly in front of the Walmart Supercenter, visible in the background. FortScott.biz photo, July 25, 2026.

 

Bourbon County’s tax record for the parcel (tax ID 002-FS10762B, in the Wal-Mart Plaza Pointe subdivision) answers the abatement question directly.

The building did change hands. The county lists Moka Rentals LLC as the current owner and taxpayer of record. That is the company named in the city’s bond documents as the tenant. Before Moka, the record shows Phoenix Fort Scott LLC, and before that Wal-Mart Stores and Wellington Ft Scott Ltd.

The 2025 taxes were paid in full, with no exemption. For tax year 2025 the county appraised the property at $1,400,000 ($193,790 in land, $1,206,210 in building) for an assessed value of $350,001. At a mill levy of 186.696 that produced a bill of $65,343.80, paid on December 18, 2025.

Tax year Owner of record Assessed value Total tax
2025 Moka Rentals LLC $350,001 $65,343.80
2024 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $377,331 $72,397.38
2023 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $422,346 $80,914.32
2022 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $413,983 $79,080.28
2021 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $395,233 $78,653.34
2020 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $389,186 $77,981.20
2019 Phoenix Fort Scott LLC $396,485 $80,160.54

So when does the abatement take effect? By the terms of the city’s own documents, the earliest it can apply is tax year 2026. Both the resolution and the ordinance say the exemption runs for ten years “commencing in the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued.” The draft bond documents date the bonds December 23, 2025. If they were issued on schedule, the first year the exemption could show up on a tax bill is 2026. Kansas tax statements for 2026 don’t go out until November.

That makes this November’s statement for 2526 S. Main the first place the exemption can appear in the public record.

The county’s appraisal record still lists the structure under its old name, “Fresenius Medical Care Dialysis,” a 7,992-square-foot medical office building put up in 2014.

The deal ran through taxable industrial revenue bonds. Despite the name, the city borrows nothing and owes nothing; it acts as a pass-through so a private project can reach two state-level tax breaks, a property-tax exemption and a sales-tax exemption on construction.

On November 18, 2025, after a public hearing, the commission voted 5-0 to move forward with Resolution 40-2025, declaring it advisable to issue about $800,000 in bonds to acquire, renovate, furnish and equip the building and lease it to Moka Rentals LLC (resolution; minutes).

Dr. Nadine Aboul-Magd, a kidney specialist with Joplin Nephrology Consultants who the minutes say served Fort Scott from 2015 to 2019, told the commission the abatement was essential to the project. The minutes record her saying the reopened clinic would employ at least seven people initially and would add two kidney physicians (minutes).

Steve Robb of Municipal Consulting LLC, who prepared the cost-benefit study Kansas requires before a city grants this kind of exemption, told commissioners the deal would return $9.67 for every dollar the city gave up, well above the 1.3 he called the cutoff for a worthwhile deal, mostly because a dialysis clinic uses a great deal of city water (minutes).

On December 16, 2025, the commission took up Ordinance No. 3792, which authorizes the bonds (ordinance). “There were no changes from what was discussed,” Mayor Tim Van Hoecke said as he introduced it (video, 2:07:39). A staff member called it “just procedural.” The commission voted and the mayor moved on. The city has not posted approved minutes for that meeting, so the exact tally is not on the public record.

Two details in the paperwork are worth knowing:

  • The break covers the bond-funded share of the property. The exemption applies only to the part of the property paid for with bond money, and it must be applied for. The one levy it cannot touch is the school district’s capital outlay levy, under the statute the resolution cites, K.S.A. 72-53,113 (resolution, § 4). For USD 234 that levy is 7.998 mills (about 4.3% of the 186.696 total on this parcel). Everything else can be abated, including Bourbon County’s share. This parcel sits in tax unit 002, which is made up of the state, Bourbon County, Fort Scott Community College, the city of Fort Scott, USD 234 and the Southwind Extension District (2025 Bourbon County levy sheet). The minutes record the city’s consultant telling commissioners that most taxing entities come out ahead, with minimal impact on the extension district and the community college (minutes).
  • The break is tied to actually running a dialysis center. The lease says that “[s]ubject to the Project being continually operated as a dialysis center,” the city will make the filings needed to keep the exemption alive for the full ten years (project lease, § 7.4).

What the city, the county and the doctor’s office said this week

On July 29, Mary Wyatt, Fort Scott’s Planning, Housing and Business Development Director, told FortScott.biz the city’s part of the deal is done. The commission voted to award the ten-year abatement, and the paperwork between the city’s bond counsel and the owner has been completed. “It’s all in the hands of the owner at this point,” she said. “The ball is just in their court to get their operations up and running.”

Wyatt said she had not heard from the owner recently. In their last conversation, she said, the owner told her that opening a dialysis clinic is a legally involved process, lining up physicians in particular, and that she wants to go about it carefully, given the building’s history of closing.

Bourbon County Appraiser Matt Quick confirmed that no exemption yet appears in county records. Once the remaining paperwork is complete, he said, the property goes into exempt status for ten years. Quick described the city as the lead on the bond arrangement.

Wyatt said the approval that mattered came from the city commission, because the city is the entity abating the taxes locally. The state’s remaining role, as she described it, is a document that “has to be acknowledged at the state level.”

Quick also sent FortScott.biz pages from the state Division of Property Valuation’s guide to these exemptions, which fills in the steps between the city’s vote and a smaller tax bill. After the bonds are issued, the applicant files an exemption application, called the IRBX form, with the county appraiser, who forwards it with comments to the Board of Tax Appeals. The exemption is deemed approved unless the board schedules a hearing within 30 days of receiving all the information. The break is not automatic once granted. The owner must file a claim with the county appraiser by March 1 each year of the ten; miss the filing, and the property goes back on the tax roll. Those filings square with what the city describes. Under the lease, keeping the exemption in place is tied to the building operating as a dialysis center.

At Joplin Nephrology Consultants, practice manager Heather said there are “no updates as of right now” on the Fort Scott clinic, which she described as Dr. Nadine’s project, and confirmed the reopening is still in the plans.

What the building looks like now

The vacant former dialysis building at 2526 S. Main, Fort Scott, with an empty parking lot
2526 S. Main on the afternoon of July 25, 2026. FortScott.biz photo.
The covered patient drop-off entrance at 2526 S. Main, with no signage on the building
The covered patient drop-off at the entrance. There is no signage on the building. FortScott.biz photo, July 25, 2026.

The lot was empty on the afternoon of July 25. There is no signage on the building or at the street, the blinds are drawn, and the covered patient drop-off, the giveaway that the place was built as a clinic, sits unused.

Fort Scott has been losing health care since 2018. Mercy announced that October that it would close the hospital it had run in town since 1886 (FortScott.biz, Oct. 3, 2018). The dialysis center closed the following September. Fresenius did not publicly give a reason for the closure. “I have talked to Fresenius,” then-City Manager Dave Martin said at the time. “They haven’t made money to the point of, they can’t stay open” (FortScott.biz, Aug. 30, 2019). Ascension Via Christi closed the emergency department in December 2023 (FortScott.biz, Dec. 18, 2023). Freeman has been working toward a hospital and emergency department here (FortScott.biz, Jan. 8, 2025).

The building has been empty since Fresenius Medical Care closed it on Sept. 30, 2019. As late as May 2023, its owner at the time said it was still looking for a tenant (FortScott.biz, May 2, 2023).

If the project comes together, that vacancy — and the three-times-a-week drives to Pittsburg or Chanute — would end.


Sources: Bourbon County tax and appraisal records for parcel 002-FS10762B, retrieved July 25, 2026; City of Fort Scott agenda packets and minutes for Nov. 18 and Dec. 16, 2025; city meeting recordings for Nov. 18 and Dec. 16, 2025. Notices ran in the Fort Scott Tribune on Nov. 8 and Dec. 20, 2025. Telephone interviews July 29, 2026, with Bourbon County Appraiser Matt Quick, Fort Scott Planning, Housing and Business Development Director Mary Wyatt, and Joplin Nephrology Consultants; pages from the Kansas Division of Property Valuation’s property-tax exemption guide provided by the appraiser’s office. Photos and map by FortScott.biz; map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Commission declines to pursue hospital donation agreement

The Bourbon County Commission on Monday rejected a proposal to set aside $300,000 in the 2027 budget to pursue enforcement of the hospital donation agreement against KRI and Legacy, and, Commissioner Motley who brought it said he would stop the attorney work already underway.

Motley, who has led the enforcement effort, laid out a detailed case that the agreement governing the donated hospital building has gone unmet on every front.

“Every aspect of the donation agreement has been violated, every aspect of it,” Motley said.

$2 million pledged, $200,000 documented

His central claim concerned money the agreement required be spent on the building. Motley said a review of records covering 2021 through 2024 — including receipts Legacy was obligated to provide — came back far short of the commitment.

“We’ve gone through all of the documents from 2021 to 2024, including receipts that Legacy was to provide to document the spending of the $2 million,” he said. “Those receipts total $200,000. Legacy did not spend the $2 million on that building. And hence we have deferred maintenance.”

Motley described the resulting condition of the property in concrete terms, citing roof leaks and HVAC problems among the maintenance issues, and pointing to the grounds — dead trees, weeds, Johnson grass at the hospital entrance, a burn barrel and piles of logs.

He said the obligation had been communicated: KRI had “certainly” been informed of its responsibility on maintenance, “and it’s not been done.”

Motley also said the property has generated no property tax revenue: “They’ve owned it since 2023, and they have not paid a dollar of taxes on that property either.”

“We gave these entities a $35 million cost building, and we gave them $2 million, and we’re going to give them $3.5 million with the sales tax. That’s over $40 million at stake. The risk of $300,000 is pretty small compared to that,” stated Motley.

The 10 beds and a $1.44 million hole

A second dispute involves 10 beds contemplated in the lease between Freeman and KRI. Motley said the lease had KRI engaging Freeman to manage those beds at $12,000 per bed per month — and that state approval will not come.

“KRI did not get approved for those 10 beds. And the state says they will never be approved for those 10 beds,” he said, adding that the state has not explained why.

By his account that leaves “a $1.44 million budget hole in Freeman that they don’t have any way to plug,” which he characterized as beyond negotiation: “It’s a static fact that can’t be changed through conversation.”

Motley argued the donation agreement takes precedence over subsequent transactions on the property: “The donation agreement is supreme in this case. And so everybody who touches that property, who files a document on that property, it’s subject to the donation agreement and the clawback provisions thereof.”

He framed the effort as a duty of the office, citing the statutory obligation of Kansas commissioners to contract for the protection and promotion of public health and welfare.

The motion fails

Motley moved to reserve $300,000 in the 2027 budget to enforce the agreement, and said plainly he expected to lose. His stated reason for forcing the question was that he could not keep authorizing legal work without knowing the county would act on it.

“I can’t in good conscience continue to ask our attorney to grind through those documents and for us to pay for that without assurance that we can enforce this agreement,” he said.

He added that if a suit were filed, he would seek an agreement from Freeman beforehand to reimburse the county’s legal fees, while acknowledging the underlying risk: “the risk would be we file a lawsuit and we don’t win. And that’s a real risk.”

Commissioner David Beerbower seconded, describing the set-aside as insurance: “We don’t even know if we’re going to have a lawsuit yet, but if you don’t have that money available and it does come around that we do have the legal grounds to safeguard our community, we’re throwing it away.” He went on to describe the detrimental affects to the community of not having a hospital, citing businesses choosing not to locate in Bourbon County and people choosing to leave: “this will go into a decline and you know then budgets will be a moot thing.”

The motion failed with Tran, Milburn, and Allen opposed.

Chairman Samuel Tran objected to committing money without a defined path: “We’re being asked to sign a blank check for $300,000 with no clear avenue to one, progress, two, what’s the end goal? There’s not a plan of action, there’s not a litigation plan.” He said he wanted KRI and Freeman brought to the table first. Commissioner Joe Allen cited hearsay and tight finances; Commissioner Mika Milburn-Kee called it a gamble.

In public comment, Anne Dare argued the money would be better spent elsewhere: “If Bourbon County truly has an additional $300,000 available, I believe those dollars should be directed toward preserving essential services, not expanding investigations. Keeping an emergency room in our community is essential.”

Courthouse elevator failure threatens jury trials

District Court leadership told the commission the courthouse elevator, out of service repeatedly since June 16, is forcing jury-trial continuances and raising the risk of speedy-trial dismissals, along with ADA access and inmate-transport concerns. Commissioners were told the failure has also trapped an employee.

After being told the elevator was fine the previous week, “I got an email from Melissa that said, ‘Judge, the elevator doesn’t work,'” Chief Judge Amy Hart told the commission. “So we’re very up and down , and that just, under federal finding, is not an operational elevator. I’m not getting in it. I walked up the stairs today.”

Hart said a decision on elevator repair is needed by August 9 regarding the next jury trial. She said they have asked the fire marshal’s office to help, as it is responsible for elevator safety in the state of Kansas.

Beerbower raised the post office’s third-floor courtroom as a possible alternate venue and proposed weekly updates.

“Honestly, not to get off on a different tangent, but what we need here in this county is a justice center,” said Tran. “All the other counties in America are building justice centers. I like this grand old building. I don’t have an issue with the building. But in order to facilitate the modern judiciary function, we need a justice center.”

The court presented an otherwise flat budget, supported in part by a $50,000 no-match audiovisual grant.

Old landfill enrolled in walk-in hunting program

The commission voted to enroll the county’s 24-acre former landfill site in the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Walk-In Hunting Access program, over two dissents.

Justin Harbit, district wildlife biologist for KDWP, described the program as walk-in access for hunting only — no vehicles or camping — with the state posting and patrolling the property, paying roughly $10 per acre annually and covering liability. He said the City of Fort Scott owns an adjacent parcel of similar size and has indicated willingness to enroll it as well. The only weapons allowed would be archery and shotgun. There is also a nearby 45-acre parcel owned by KDOT that he is attempting to get enrolled.

Milburn-Kee opposed, saying the land should be sold and returned to the tax rolls, and objected to voting without public input. Tran also opposed, saying he wanted to hear from constituents first.

During public comment, Pete Owenby pressed on why the site has not been sold: “That’s county land. The county owns that. Why does the county own it? That should be on the market.” Staff said a Kansas Department of Health and Environment restriction bars disturbing the soil until 30 years have passed, cited in the meeting as 2039.

Other business

  • Accounts payable of approximately $483,656 was approved, along with minutes from the July 13, July 20 and July 22 meetings and the June and second-quarter financials.
  • The commission entered a 15-minute attorney-client executive session with counselor Bob Johnson and returned with no action.
  • Beerbower flagged decentralized Verizon and commodity purchasing as potential budget savings.
  • Michael Hoyt raised new state laws, including cell-phone and school-zone provisions. Kyle Parks, comprehensive plan and zoning committee member, urged the commission to keep the comprehensive plan and zoning effort moving.
  • Matt Lawn with Baker Tilly went over the initial draft of the county commission’s general fund budget including juvenile detention, courthouse maintenance, IT, fair board, economic development, health board, soil conservation, and other categories.
  • EMS Director Terry Halsey presented the board with detailed information in response to commissioner Milburn-Kee’s comment in last week’s meeting about possibly going to one ambulance for the county, which “opened up a Pandora’s box on Facebook,” said Halsey.
  • Public Works Director Kenny Allen sought a new CAT 420 backhoe for the transfer station (4.99%, funded through existing fees) after the old one’s frame cracked; the commission approved it contingent on Matt Lawn confirming budget, over Motley/Milburn-Kee requests for competing bids.

The commission also signed the Jared Gilmore Phillips audit engagement, approved wiping all Stronghold security-camera credentials removing all access for employees outside of Stronghold, and tabled the planning/zoning department, forensic RFP, opioid-fund application, commission policy, and an election-office space swap (which failed on a vote to defer). Beerbower closed with a pointed statement defending decisive, change-oriented leadership.

Clerk Drops Recall Lawsuit, Waives Any Future Challenge to the Petition

Bourbon County Clerk Susan Walker has dropped the lawsuit she filed in May to invalidate the petition seeking her recall, ending the case hours before a hearing that had been scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.

A Stipulation of Dismissal was electronically filed at 9:48 a.m. on July 28 in Bourbon County District Court, and District Judge Richard M. Fisher Jr. signed it the same morning. The case, Walker v. Crux (BB-2026-CV-000048), is dismissed with prejudice, meaning Walker cannot bring it again.

A motion hearing had been set for 1:30 p.m. that same day. Court records now show it canceled.

Walker sued on May 22, arguing the recall petition circulated against her was invalid because County Attorney James Crux never issued the written legal-sufficiency determination that K.S.A. 25-4322(b) requires. Her position was that Crux reviewed and rejected an earlier draft but never independently reviewed the amended version that was actually circulated for signatures. She asked the court to declare the petition invalid and to block any recall election based on it.

She originally named Crux along with three recall committee members, Kyle R. Parks, Kevin Wagner and Lyle K. Owenby, then narrowed the case to Crux alone. The three members were dismissed on May 29 and spent June asking the court to let them rejoin.

By July the case had three fully briefed motions waiting on the judge: the committee members’ motion to intervene, Wagner’s motion to set aside the order dismissing the committee, and Crux’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, which asked the court to rule the petition legally sufficient and let it go to the voters. Walker had filed her response to that motion on July 8.

The stipulation was filed under K.S.A. 60-241 by all parties who had appeared in the case. It sets out four terms:

  • Walker agrees to pay the proposed intervenors eight hundred dollars.
  • Walker waives all future legal claims challenging the Petition to Recall Susan E. Walker or process related to it.
  • The proposed intervenors agree to withdraw their motion to intervene.
  • The proposed intervenors waive all claims against Walker for attorney’s fees.

The document is signed by Jonathan L. Ehrlich for Walker, Jacob D. Bielenberg for Crux, and Patrick B. Hughes for the three committee members, who are represented by both Patrick B. Hughes and Quinn M. Hughes.

None of the three contested motions was ever decided.

That distinction matters. Crux’s motion for judgment on the pleadings asked the court to hold that the recall petition was legally sufficient, which was the central legal question in the case. The court never reached it. A judge did not uphold the petition; the challenge to it was withdrawn and waived by the person who brought it.

The motion to intervene was likewise never granted or denied. The committee members withdrew it themselves as part of the agreement. Wagner’s motion to set aside was never decided either.

One note for readers who look the case up themselves: the state’s public case-search portal lists the July 28 disposition as “Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution.” That label does not match the signed order, which is a stipulated dismissal agreed to by every party and entered while the case was actively briefed and set for hearing. The filed document is the authoritative record.

Timeline and documents

For readers who want the fuller history, here are the key filings and our prior coverage, in order:

Background: the recall petition and the clerk’s public statement on the recall.

Read the newest filing: Stipulation of Dismissal (PDF), filed and signed July 28, 2026 in Bourbon County District Court, Case No. BB-2026-CV-000048.

Being named in a lawsuit is not a finding of wrongdoing, and the filings described here reflect each party’s arguments, not the court’s conclusions. FortScott.biz will continue to follow the recall.

City manager: rail spur into the industrial park ‘sounds very possible’

Fort Scott City Manager Brad Matkin told city commissioners on Tuesday, July 21, that he has finally found someone at the railroad willing to talk about running a rail spur into the city’s industrial park — and that the railroad is willing to bring one in.

Nothing has been agreed to, and nobody has voted on anything. But the report was the most concrete public word yet on infrastructure that would shape what kind of employers Fort Scott can try to attract.

“I finally found somebody from the railroad that wants to talk, and it happens to be an economic development person for the railroad,” Matkin said. After a meeting the previous Friday, he said, “they are willing to bring a spur up right now up to the south of Timken, actually south of Valu.”

“It sounds very possible that we will be getting a railroad spur out to Industrial Park,” he said. “And manufacturing background can tell you how big that is.” He called it “huge for economic development in the future, because not that many industries have spurs going behind them.”

Satellite view of the Fort Scott Industrial Park with the BNSF railroad running north to south along the east edge
The BNSF main line runs north–south just east of the former Timken Belts plant on Campbell Drive. Matkin says the railroad is willing to bring a spur up to the south of the building. Satellite imagery ©2026 Google; annotation by FortScott.biz.

Matkin said they were meeting again that Friday and would “continue meeting until we get this thing ironed out.” He said the railroad “has been listening. They’ve been cooperative. They want the business, of course.”

The railroad wants to tie the spur into a Columbus, Kansas, line rather than a Springfield, Missouri, line, Matkin said, adding that he could not explain the reasoning. Public rail maps show two BNSF lines meeting just south of the industrial park — one running southeast toward Springfield, the other southwest through Columbus.

Two-panel map showing the BNSF Fort Scott Subdivision and Afton Subdivision meeting just south of the Fort Scott Industrial Park
Two BNSF lines meet just south of the Fort Scott Industrial Park — one running southeast toward Springfield, Mo., the other southwest through Columbus, Kan. Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Matkin’s own ask is that the track not stop short. Running it behind the Timken building, he said, would let more than one company use it: that “would give a runway through their parking lot that you could bring from other companies to that spur.”

That is the case for rail access. A spur ties a plant to the main line, and for a manufacturer that ships heavy or bulk freight, having or sharing one is often what decides whether a site gets a serious look. The company buying the Timken building has raised it with him directly, Matkin said: “They’ve been talking to me about the railroad spur. That’s very important to them.”

The Timken building is why the timing matters. Timken announced in November 2023 that it would wind down its belts plant at 4505 Campbell Road and close it in 2025; about 155 people worked there. On the city’s radio show on July 16, Matkin said “the Timken building is sold. The contract is signed and everything,” with the buyer’s name and line of business expected “later in the month or first of August,” pending paperwork and financing. He has not named the buyer.

Next door, Diversey, the cleaning-products company that said in May it would put a blending plant and warehouse in the former Valu Merchandisers building, is already at work on its building, Matkin said, coordinating with the city’s fire department and engineer on code. Both buildings had been sitting empty. “These are big companies that are coming in,” he said.

A second rail item came up the same night on a different project: Commissioner Matthew Wells asked about the study the city is running with Fontana and Spring Hill through the firm Wilson & Company. That one is about crossings rather than spurs. Fort Scott, Spring Hill and Fontana share a $2.15 million BNSF planning grant, of which $800,000 covers the Fort Scott end of the work; the city put up $40,000 to match it. The study is meant to determine whether Fort Scott needs an overpass, Jayhawk Road is the hoped-for location, and which existing crossing BNSF would want closed in exchange. Matkin said it is underway, with the city’s business development director, Mary Wyatt, leading it.

Matkin’s report on the spur begins about 1:43:40 into the city’s video of the July 21 meeting.