Aug. 11 Bourbon County Commission Repeals Salary Resolution

The north wing, east side of the Bourbon County Courthouse.

Brad Matkin, Ft. Scott City Manager, address the Bourbon County Commissioners regarding a number of items including the county’s taking on of providing E911 service, asphalt production for the City of Fort Scott and the cancellation of the IT agreement the city had with the county.

There has been no update from the budget committee regarding the E911 agreement yet.

Matkin said that Ft. Scott wants to purchase asphalt from Bourbon County, as the city now has equipment to lay it themselves. “We would like to purchase asphalt in the county to keep the money in the county,” said Matkin. He said they would need about 2,000 tons in 2025 and more in 2026.

Commissioner Mika Milburn expressed concern about how the workload of the county’s public works department would be affected and wants to recheck the cost of production.

Matkin pointed out that it would be another revenue source for Bourbon County, and that the city would communicate with Public Works regarding how much and when the asphalt was needed.

“Bottom line: looking out for the tax payer in Bourbon County,” he said.

Commissioner Samuel Tran asked for the details of the job, pointing out the county needs to have enough raw materials and the manpower to create the asphalt. He also asked for another look at the interlocal agreement between the City of Fort Scott and Bourbon County.

Milburn suggested that the city crews might be able to help the county with the county’s asphalt laying. Beerbower suggested that city workers might help county workers in the asphalt plant.

Tran was concerned about liability and tax laws and wants to, “take it one step at a time.”

Matkin asked them to discuss and gather the information they need and he will come back in a couple of weeks.

Finally, the city cancelled its Memorandum of Understanding with Bourbon County for IT Support for the City of Fort Scott. It had been in place since 2023.

Bob Guilfoyle and Justin with Craw Kan Internet and Telephone

The county has been on a month-to-month agreement with Craw Kan for internet service for the last three years.

Guilfoyle brought two separate proposals. One with the county on one big network for $1,100 per month, which wouldn’t change anything with how the network is set up, but is at a lower cost than the current $1,400 per month the county is paying.

Craw Kan was in the process of talking with the Sheriff’s Department about separating it’s network from the rest of the county. “This network is huge,” said Guilfoyle. It’s one of the biggest networks Craw Kan has.

Craw Kan’s second proposal for $1,220 per month, would upgrade the county system to a gig for the courthouse and a gig for the sheriff’s department. The Sheriff’s department would then need to get it’s own firewall, since it wouldn’t be using the one at the courthouse.

Tran asked Guilfoyle to take the numbers back to his manager and see if he can get a lower price.

Separating the internet also means separating phones from the County.

Craw Kan representatives said they need better direction from the county to know what information regarding costs and services they offer.

The commission decided to table the decision until August 25, so they can run the information by the county counsel and collect more information.

Department Updates
County Clerk Susan Walker

An RNR hearing is set for August 25 and a budget hearing needs to be published too. Dates need to be picked based on when the paper is published.

The budget advisory committee plans to present a budget document to the commission for them to alter as they see fit. The committee head, Greg Motley, wants to protect the volunteerism of the committee members and not have all of them come to the budget work session the commission has planned for 5:30, Aug. 21.

The commission will choose a date for the budget hearing after that work session.

Election update: Tuesday, Oct. 14 is the deadline to register or update registration. On Oct. 20, early voting begins at courthouse. Nov. 4 is the general election.

Walker advised Bourbon County voters to check their new voter registration cards for voting locations. If the information is incorrect, return to sender through the postal system so the clerk’s office can receive it. Do not bring it into the courthouse.

Walker offered a session to go over financials with the commission.

RNR Hearing letters were mailed out and published in the newspaper. This year the county will be reimbursed by the state for that cost.

Walker also thanked WardKraft and the city of Fort Scott for their help, “in a pinch.”

County Appraiser Matt Quick

The state of Kansas has declared the appraiser’s office to be in compliance. This is based on statistical performance and accuracy of valuations. Smaller homes are one of the big categories that are undervalued in Bourbon County. This is all determined by the market, not county or state officials.

Tran read statistics about the taxes paid in the county and surrounding counties.

Old Business
Benefits Committee Bylaws – Commissioner David Beerbower moved to rebuild the committee per the bylaws, getting one employee from each of the categories of coverage options. He suggested getting lists of who is in each of those groups and asking for individuals from them to volunteer for the committee. The motion carried.

Hospital Equipment

The sale is underway on govdeals.com

Casey Brown Letter of Support

Motion to sign the letter of support for the rides at SEK-CAP with no monetary contribution was approved.

Planning Commission Creation Resolution

Michael Hoyt spoke to the commission about the updated resolution edited by the county counsel. He said the document only lists KSA 12-744, which must be incorporated with all the other state statutes that apply.

Hoyt says the county doesn’t have the right of home rule, cited in the second paragraph of the current resolution, per the KSA regulation, thus those words should be removed from the resolution.

The commission voted to table it until county counsel can look it over.

Payroll Discussion

Milburn said there’s been a lot of discussion about use of payroll service. She said the commission has received emails from the company being considered and that they will handle the payroll needs of the county, freeing up county personnel.

Susan Walker, County Clerk, said that the current software company has said they will loose all their historical data in the conversion, so all those records will have to be printed or stored some other way for access. Payroll records have to be kept forever, per the Kansas Historical Society. The payroll company representative said he didn’t think that was necessary and that they should defer to Dr. Cohen, the county’s HR provider.

Walker disagreed, expressed that she doesn’t feel like she or her deputy clerk are being heard when they express their concerns to the commission about the costs and difficulties of the transfer. She was also adamant that she cannot run her office if the commission cuts a person from it.

Walker said that in the past, the county’s benefits were administered by the state of Kansas and when the county “left the state of Kansas” all that work came to the clerk’s office.

“I feel like I have given a lot to this organization with my experience and I feel like it’s retaliatory,” said Walker. “If you cut my pay, I don’t know that we want to do these services in our offices as before.”

Milburn said that her office had always been doing these services. Walker disagreed and said that they are doing a whole lot more work now than in the past. That was why the commission voted to pay her extra for her payroll duties in January.

Milburn moved to go with Emerson and Company for Payroll. Motion carried.

108 W 2nd Street

Milburn had conversations with the driver’s licence office and they want to move to the courthouse. She discussed how this could save the county money and consolidate services for county residents. The commission decided she should go ahead with the work and keep reporting back to them.

Budget Discussion

Milburn questioned the amount being paid for budget, payroll, benefits and road records.

Beerbower asked about the election budget. Walker said they were going to be short by $1,500 of the costs for elections this year.

Beerbower said he was not for resolution 1425 in January and thought it went through too fast, but he also doesn’t want to handicap the departments the money went to. He suggested reviewing it in January, 2026 when the salary resolutions are voted on.

Walker asked if they don’t want her doing budget next year either.

Milburn made a motion to repeal resolution 1425, 1225, and strike the chief operations officer for $88,616, extra assigned duties budget payroll and benefits officer for $10,000, and road records officer for $5,000.

The extra assigned duties budget payroll and benefits officer was paid to the clerk for the extra duties, but there’s also an employee in her office who does that work under her supervision.

Tran asked what happens if we remove it. Beerbower said that because it’s incorporated into payroll, a new resolution with the new salary amount will need to be passed by the commission.

“If we’re taking some of that work away, then I don’t see why it’s unreasonable,” said Milburn.

The motion passed.

New Business

Insurance Meeting Request

Milburn asked for a meeting with the county’s insurance broker, Don Doherty on Aug. 22 to educate the commissioners.

Commission Comments

Tran: “Tonight was tough,” he said. He thinks that the three commissioners will need to come to a consensus at the budget work session regarding the mill level.

“We have to be professional…that’s the only way we’re going to get through this,” he concluded.

Milburn: The tax sale has been sent to the law firm as of 8/8/2025.

She also wanted to inform citizens that the property tax rate is based on the market and is out of the commission’s hands. The only thing the commission controls is the mill levy.

“I don’t want to burden the tax base. We don’t have a lot of ways we can not do that, but we have to try,” she said.

Beerbower: “This isn’t something that’s going to get solved year one,” he said of the budget issues. He said they need to make good decisions with the tax payers money.

“Mission first, men always,” you have to take care of your people, he concluded.

Obituary of Delphia Ann Chow

Delphia Ann Chow, 92, of Fort Scott, passed away Friday, August 8, 2025, in Leawood, Kansas. She was born on March 23, 1933, in Mullens, West Virginia, the daughter of Willard Lee Basham and Sinda Florence (Shrewsbury) Basham. She married Stanley L.Y. Chow, M.D. on February 21, 1953, in Mullens, West Virginia; he preceded her in death on May 11, 1998.

Ann graduated from Fort Scott Community College, Nursing School, and was a practicing nurse for many years. Ann loved to sing and was an active member in the St Mary’s Catholic Church Choir for many years. She was also a member of the Diamond Community Church while residing in Fort Scott. She renewed her baptism at Austin Ridge Bible Church in Austin, Texas at the age of 90.

Survivors include her children: Nancy Thompson, Roseburg, Oregon, Patricia Chow-Dewey, London, England, Susanne Chow, M.D., Leawood, Kansas, Shirley Chow, M.D., Georgetown, Texas, Carolyn Chow, Sherman Oaks, California and Frank Michael Chow, M.D., Austin, Texas; twenty grandchildren: Christopher Thompson, Benjamin Thompson, Nicholas Thompson, Kathryn Chivarsky, Nicole Grierson, Tate Dewey, Alicia Wolfe, Andrea Bone, Alexander Rose, Lauren Richardson, Emily Richardson, Michael Elmendorf, Adam Stockhoff, Allison Chow, Mia Chow, Erin Sauter, Morgan Sauter, Catherine Sauter, Gina Dixon and Megan Dixon; and eighteen great-grandchildren. Ann was preceded in death by her husband, Stanley LY Chow. M.D., her parents; two brothers, Roy Basham, and Willard Basham, Jr.; five sisters, Bonnie Troup, Orean Kirk, Dorothy Hatcher, Beulah Rowe, and Edna Umile; a son, Gary Lee Dixon; a daughter, Michelle Chow-Sauter, M.D. and a granddaughter, Amber Rose.

Funeral services are scheduled for 10:00 a.m. Saturday, August 16, 2025, at the Konantz-Cheney Funeral Home, with burial following at the St. Mary’s Cemetery, in Fort Scott. The family will receive friends at the funeral home from 6:00 pm-7:00 p.m. on Friday evening, August 15, 2025. Memorial contributions can be directed towards the American Cancer Society and World Central Kitchen, and may be left in the care of the Konantz-Cheney Funeral Home, 15 W. Wall Street, P.O. Box 309, Fort Scott, KS, 66701.  Friends and family may sign the online guest book and share memories at www.konantzcheney.com.

Celebrate the National Park Service’s Anniversary at Fort Scott NHS

 

Fort Scott, Kan. – Fort Scott National Historic Site celebrates the anniversary of the National Park Service, Monday, August 25, 2025, with a series of family-friendly games, trivia, a scavenger hunt throughout the day, fort tours at 10 am and 1 pm, and a musical and a performance by the 1st Infantry Division Band from Fort Riley. Activities are appropriate for visitors of all ages and abilities.

 

Fort Scott National Historic Site will host the 1st Infantry Division Band from Fort Riley beginning at 6 pm. The performance will be on the bricks in front of the Post Hospital/Visitor Center. Bring your lawn chair to ensure seating.

 

In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the “Organic Act” which stated that the purpose of the newly formed National Park Service was “to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein, and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.” What better way to celebrate the Park Service’s anniversary than with a fun-filled day in your national park with the family!

 

Fort Scott and Fort Riley have a connection. Fort Scott closed operations in 1853, the same year Fort Riley was opened. The Fort Scott Dragoons and the Fort Riley Cavalry both shared portions of the same mission at different times, providing protection on the Oregon and Santa Fe Trails.

 

Historical Note of Interest about the band: One notable example of the use of bands in Vietnam was the “Thunder Road” incident, which received national publicity. Major General John Hay, Commanding General of the 1st Infantry Division, ordered his band to march down “Thunder Road” for a distance of one mile while playing the march Colonel Bogey. This road was critical to the division but was under the control of a North Vietnamese Army regiment located less than a mile away. The enemy confused by the action withdrew from the area. The 1st Infantry Division Band fulfilled a remarkable combat mission without firing a shot.

 

Fort Scott National Historic Site is one of 430+ nationally significant sites and is truly the story of America growing up.

 

-NPS-

 

Credit Photo as: Image of NPS arrowhead, 1st Infantry Division Band’s logo, and A Company of the 1st Dragoons guidon.

 

Letter to the Editor: Nick Graham

First, Stabilize The Patient

My wife loves TV medical dramas, from ER to House to most recently The Pitt.  If it’s an hour long show that takes place in a hospital, chances are she’s seen every episode.  These TV shows more often than not begin with some poor shlep being wheeled into the ER, afflicted with some sort of massive physical trauma that the main characters have to spend the remainder of the episode trying to save.

I think our Bourbon County government is like one of those patients right now, more specifically I liken it to someone who has been sprayed with machine gun fire and is bleeding out from a million different holes.  I know a small minority might dispute this fact, but our County now has an independent board made up of bankers, CPAs, and other financial pros, and they’ve all pored over the numbers and come to the same conclusion – Bourbon County is just about broke.

Now, in all of these TV shows, the first thing the nurses and doctors try to do is stabilize the patient.  If they don’t do that, and some well meaning but young, inexperienced doc or nurse tries some invasive procedure on the patient before stabilizing them, then the patient “crashes” and dies.  From watching recent County Commission meetings, I fear that in their rush to “fix” the bleeding, our new Commissioners, who I think have nothing but the best intentions, may end up crashing the patient.  To take the medical analogy a step further, when I watch the Commission meetings, I keep waiting to hear the word “stabilize”, but more often than not I get the feeling they’re gearing up for mass amputation, which I believe would be a fatal mistake.

The learning curve of a County Commissioner is a pretty steep one.  It’s a unique job and it takes time to learn the ins and outs of each department, what they do, and who does what.  This is not something that can be accomplished in six or eight months – it’s just not.  Trust has to be built, relationships have to be built, and only then can you get a good feel for how the machine operates, and in turn how it might operate better and more efficiently.

At the beginning of this year, morale in our County government was pretty much in the toilet.  Events I won’t get into here, along with talk of doom and gloom, outsourcing, and cuts have sunk that morale even further, and at this point we’re gonna need to call Roto-Rooter to get it back up.  That’s not to say these things shouldn’t be discussed – every rural county with a declining population is, and these are conversations that need to be had, but not as topics sprung with a few days notice on an unsuspecting workforce.  I genuinely believe all three of our County Commissioners are acting in good faith on what they think is best for Bourbon County, but change is a slow and tedious process in local government, and trying to rush change usually leads to disaster.

There is a LOT to fix, and by the time all is said and done, Bourbon County may come out looking more like Robocop than the county it first entered the ER as, but that process has to be given time.  To our Commissioners, I say this – go slow.  I’m not saying rubber stamp every budget request that comes through this year, I’m just saying get the lay of the land, give yourselves some time to learn the job and build relationships, and then make the process of improving efficiency a bottom-up effort instead of a top down mandate.

You won’t accomplish this by Christmas – it’s not humanly possible, and it’s going to be a multi-year process.  Study our neighboring counties that are doing well and see how their offices are staffed and run – the beautiful thing about local government is that there is no problem out there that somebody hasn’t run into before and learned how to solve.  That being said, there are no quick fixes, at least ones that won’t leave the patient worse off than they were when they first got wheeled into your Operating Room.  Right now that patient is in a precarious state – what you do next will determine whether we’re headed for recovery or a crash.  The good news is that, contrary to what you might read on Facebook, you have time.

Nick Graham
Uniontown, KS

Note: FortScott.biz publishes opinion pieces with a variety of perspectives. If you would like to share your opinion, please send a letter to [email protected]

Chamber Coffee is Hosted by Fort Scott Dental on August 14

Join us for Chamber Coffee

hosted by

Fort Scott Family Dental

Thursday, August 14th

8am

2 N. Main St.

We hope to see you there!

The Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce invites members and guests to a Chamber Coffee hosted by Fort Scott Family Dental, 2 N. Main St., this Thursday, August 14th, at 8am. Coffee, juice, and refreshments will be served, and attendees may register to win a special drawing.

Fort Scott Family Dental is excited to welcome the community to this week’s Chamber Coffee. Since their last hosting, the practice has grown while continuing to support downtown happenings and events. They are now accepting new patients from Fort Scott and the surrounding area, offering a full range of services from cleanings, exams, fillings, extractions, crowns, and bridges, as well as oral surgery options like implants and surgical extractions. Plans are also underway to expand services and update insurance networks.

Their friendly, knowledgeable team is always ready to answer questions and help clients achieve their best smile.

For more information, contact the Chamber of Commerce at (620) 223-3566. Visit the Events Calendar and category of Chamber Coffees on fortscott.com for upcoming locations.

Click HERE to visit the

Fort Scott Family Dental Facebook Page!

Thank you to our Chamber Champion members shown below…
Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce

231 E. Wall St., Fort Scott, KS 66701

620-223-3566

fortscott.com

Facebook  X  Instagram
Fort Scott Area Chamber of Commerce | 231 E. Wall Street | Fort Scott, KS 66701 US
 

Bourbon County Employee Health Plans

The following graphic shows the breakdown of the employee and employer amounts paid for health insurance for employees of Bourbon County.   According to the chart, a county employee with full healthcare coverage for themselves will be paid 100% by the county. The county’s cost for these plans is $820.11 or $902.35, depending on whether the employee chooses the high deductible plan with a Health Savings Account or a lower deductible one with a Flexible Spending Account.

An employee who wants to put their entire family on the county’s high deductible plan will have to pay $420.80 for their portion and the county will kick in $2,181.06 to pay the rest of the premium. This represents an additional $1,360.95 of county contribution for family coverage over what the county pays to cover just the employee.

Opinion: Planning Committee, Zoning, Houdini, and Current Probable Outcomes

Last Monday, the commission voted to put together a resolution to create a planning committee with the idea that it could eventually become the zoning committee when they implement zoning. It sounds like they want to try to vote to approve it today on August 11th.

After listening to all the zoning discussions in the community meetings, I am convinced that there is a potential future where zoning could be implemented in the county that would not be harmful and might even provide some benefits. Even with perfect execution, I’m not sure it is worth it. But either way, just because something is possible does not necessarily mean it is probable. So the real question is, how likely is Bourbon County to end up with zoning that is not harmful if implemented today? The answer for today is very near 0%. It might be different in the future, but right now, every piece of evidence we have indicates that implementing zoning would be a fiasco.

Does that sound like a bold statement? Not really. All we have to do is look at a few recent situations that are much less complex than zoning and use the outcome of those situations to project what would happen if zoning is implemented today.

First, let’s consider the recent lawsuit where the county lost by default. When a lawsuit comes to the county, it is supposed to make its way to the county counselor, and they will show up for the hearing date and defend the county.  Despite receiving a summons, despite knowing that the lawsuit was in process, and despite the hearing date being clearly posted to kscourts.gov, no one showed up to represent the county. It isn’t exactly clear why, and for the purposes of my argument here, it doesn’t matter. The point is that the county is struggling to function in what should be a very trivial matter of showing up to defend against a lawsuit when the judge schedules a hearing.

But maybe that was just a fluke. Do we have any other similar situations?

Let’s consider a second example: the issue of the Southeast Kansas Regional Juvenile Detention Center.  In June, the Sheriff’s department suggested that the county could save money by switching to a different provider. Later in June, the county learned that it owns 1/10th of the detention center—ownership that would be forfeited if they pull out of the contract. Not only does the county own part of the detention center, but one of the commissioners is on the board that sets the prices. Unfortunately, he has never attended any of the board meetings.

Later in July, the commissioners voted to cancel the contract, but they missed the July 1st deadline by about 20 days, so the county is stuck in the contract until 2027.  Was it a good idea to cancel the contract? I have no idea. But I do know that if you are on the board that sets the price and you don’t like the price, the first thing to do is to show up for the board meetings. And, if for some reason you actually do have enough information to know it is a good idea to cancel, it seems like it would have been a good idea to not miss the date by 20 days so you are committed for another year. And if you do miss the date by 20 days, it might make sense to attend at least one board meeting before you vote to cancel the contract.

The list goes on. Now when I look at these types of situations, I don’t see a commission that is necessarily doing a bad job. I see a commission that is new. There is a huge body of knowledge they are trying to acquire quickly. Based on their past work history, it is unlikely they are going to have much prior experience to draw from. That isn’t criticism, it is just pointing out that there is a lot to do and learn, and it is reasonable to expect some missteps along the way as they find their footing.

However, we can also look at these types of situations and get a pretty good idea of what type of results the county will have to live with if they move forward with creating a planning committee as a step toward implementing zoning. The county commission is struggling with basic functions like showing up for a lawsuit, showing up for board meetings of county-owned entities, and deciding on issues before contracts lock you in for another year. These are things that have a high probability of being handled correctly once the commissioners acquire the experience and knowledge they need to effectively do their jobs. Implementing zoning has a very high probability of doing injury to the county and a small chance of being done in a way that is beneficial—even once they have experience. Without experience, we can easily extrapolate the expected results.

Imagine you are Houdini’s manager and he wants to do a stunt where he is fastened in chains, put in a box, and dumped in the ocean. If many of his attempts to do the stunt on land result in failure, you would be wise to caution him against doing the far more risky version underwater. Once he has a solid track record of escaping his bonds on land, then the underwater version starts having a chance of being successful.

Until the commissioners have a track record of handling the basic functions, they shouldn’t launch a planning committee taking steps toward something that has a high degree of risk. The two examples I listed above give the expected, most probable outcome if they decide to do it before.

Mark Shead

Note: FortScott.biz publishes opinion pieces with a variety of perspectives. If you would like to share your opinion, please send a letter to [email protected]

Bourbon County Local News