Fort Scott Biz

Sheriff’s $90,139 computer bill passes 4-1 a week after failing; building-sale money goes to employee bonuses

FORT SCOTT — A week after it failed on a 2-2 vote, a resolution to pay $90,139.25 from the county’s jail sales tax fund for the Bourbon County Sheriff’s Office’s new computer system passed 4-1 Monday, after the sheriff’s advisor told commissioners the office had already gone ahead with the purchase.

Commissioners also voted to use the $120,390.36 the county received from the sale of the building at 108 West 2nd Street for a one-time appreciation bonus for county employees, and heard from a resident who said he paid $113 for a records request that produced little more than a photo.

Chairman Gregg Motley presided, with Commissioners Samuel Tran, David Beerbower, Joe Allen and Mika Milburn-Kee. All five were present; Tran had been absent the previous two weeks.

Sheriff’s computer bill

The question began during the accounts payable. Milburn-Kee pointed to two large sheriff’s office charges on this week’s bills, a $16,598 server and $14,345 in computers, and asked whether they were in addition to the computers already approved. Brian Murphy, a retired Allen County sheriff who now advises the sheriff’s office, said they were part of the roughly $90,000 the office had requested the week before, not on top of it. He said the commission had approved 12 computers and the office needs about 26 in all. Tran noted the two charges come to $30,943.

When the item came up under old business, Murphy said the office had checked with Baker Tilly, the county’s accounting firm, and was told the cost fits within the sheriff’s budget. He asked the commission instead to let the office pay it from the jail sales tax fund, which he put at about $1.899 million. The county treasurer’s quarterly report in the meeting packet shows $1,899,743.58 in that fund on Sept. 30. Milburn-Kee asked how much of the fund is already committed, and Murphy said he could not say.

“So you already spent money, so…” Beerbower said.

“Yes, we already moved forward, being that we knew that the money was in our budget,” Murphy said. “… Luckily enough, we’ve watched our P’s and Q’s, and we should be okay. But if we could get it out of sales tax, that would make us a whole lot more comfortable.” Milburn-Kee later explained that the Sheriff’s office does not have permission to use the sales tax fund, but must be granted it by the commission.

Murphy said a letter the office received from the KBI two weeks ago requires computers connected to state systems to run Windows 11, and that the office’s existing machines are too old to be upgraded. The deadline mentioned at the table was Jan. 1. He said the new provider, Advantage Computer Enterprises of Iola, bills by the visit rather than through a contract, and that Advantage has worked for the district court and the county attorney’s office for years. “We pay it by visit. If we have an issue, they come and fix it,” he said. The company’s July 22 estimate, included in last week’s packet, lists an eight-month labor contract that includes $5,000 prepaid, and a monitoring service at $11,160 a year for 29 devices.

Tran said he worried the cost would migrate into the sheriff’s budget over time, as he said was predicted when the county approved the sheriff’s vehicle leases through Enterprise. “So what stops that from happening here? What happens from you having a mission creep?” he asked. He also asked whether the county’s cyber insurance could be affected by having more than one IT provider. “My understanding is, as technology evolves, the insurance company requires one computer tech company, not two, not three,” he said. Murphy said he did not know insurance.

Motley said that installation is not included in the quote, at an estimated $200 to $250 per machine. “It’s going to be higher than this,” he said. “I’m hoping not,” Murphy said.

Beerbower moved to adopt the resolution he presented the previous week, for $90,139.25 from the sales tax fund. The total is $2,424 more than the $87,715.25 on the company’s July 22 estimate; a handwritten change on the estimate raises the desktop count from 12 to 14, which accounts for the difference. He said technology is an allowed use of the jail sales tax while other costs, such as a homicide investigation, are not, so paying for the computers from the tax protects the sheriff’s budget, and that money left over in that budget at the end of the year would go toward reducing property taxes. That point was disputed: commissioners and Murphy disagreed over where the sheriff’s year-end carryover goes, and Milburn-Kee said she doubted any savings would come back as a lower tax levy.

Before the vote, Tran said he wished the process had been more transparent. “I was never against him getting a server. And he knows that. But we never talked about how he was going to fund it,” he said, referring to Sheriff Bill Martin. Undersheriff Kevin Davidson replied that “Bill’s been up here asking to do this for a long time.”

The motion passed 4 to 1, Milburn-Kee voting against.

Last week’s discussion of the bill is here, and a breakdown of what it covers is here.

Building sale money to employee bonuses

The building at 108 West 2nd sold for $125,000, and the county netted $120,390.36 after a $3,750 real estate commission and closing costs, according to the settlement statement in the packet. Beerbower proposed using all of it for an employee appreciation bonus for every county employee except the commissioners, with part-time employees receiving half. He said he had talked with each elected official and department head except Public Works, and that the consensus was “this would be a great way for us to show appreciation to our employees.”

Motley estimated it would come to about $1,100 for full-time employees and $550 for part-time. Beerbower said Baker Tilly would calculate the exact amounts.

Allen said he was not against a bonus but wanted to see the breakdown before voting, and said some employees have asked about bringing back a Christmas dinner. Milburn-Kee asked whether some of the money might be needed for vacation payouts the county had not budgeted for this year. “The sale of that building may have just dug us out of a hole to pay a lot of those vacations out,” she said.

Beerbower moved to use the money for an appreciation bonus “pending calculations by our finance department.” The motion passed 3-2 on a voice vote, with Tran and Milburn-Kee voting against.

Records requests and Stronghold Data

Beerbower brought up the county’s handling of records requests under the Kansas Open Records Act after a resident contacted him about a request that was billed once and then billed again at a higher amount. The county’s IT contractor, Stronghold Data, began charging the county $95 an hour to retrieve emails for such requests, as fortscott.biz has reported.

The requester, Thomas Metcalf Jr., told commissioners he was first quoted $90 for five hours of work, then was told Stronghold would charge $95 an hour on top of that. He said he received the records on the eighth day, and that what he got was a photo and a screenshot of an email inbox, not the emails he asked for. He said the final invoice added $18 for an hour of an employee’s time, and that he paid $113 in all.

“So I paid $113 for a photo. I mean, that’s ridiculous,” Metcalf said. He didn’t receive anything else he requested. He said he has worked in local government for 22 years. “Put things back in-house, please.”

Tran asked who negotiated the $95 rate. Reading from emails in the packet, he said Stronghold reported spending 150 hours on 51 records requests that had been covered under its support agreement, and that Motley, the clerk and the county counselor were on an Aug. 21 email about the charges. In a later email in the packet, dated Nov. 3, Stronghold put the total at 65 requests and just over 107 hours since July 2025. Motley said Stronghold called him to say it would start charging. “They had more KORA requests for us than all the other clients combined,” he said. “Allen County has had one KORA request this year.”

County Clerk Ann Clarkson said Stronghold is the county’s contracted IT department and only it can retrieve emails. “Either way, they’re charging us, and so we either eat it or pass it on,” she said.

Beerbower read a passage he attributed to K.S.A. 45-219(c), saying the law limits records fees to the cost of the lowest-paid staff who can do the work and that passing a vendor’s hourly rate on to a requester is not allowed. He said the state puts IT labor at about $40 to $50 an hour. He proposed a single countywide records policy with an appeal process, a written record of each search, and a requirement to contact the requester when a request will cost more than $200 or take more than five hours. Motley said the clerk, as the official keeper of records, would be the natural clearinghouse. No action was taken on a policy.

Stronghold’s 2025 managed-services quote, signed by the county and included in the packet, says the company would handle email records requests “at no additional cost under a full managed services agreement.” In a Nov. 3 email in the packet, Stronghold said it would waive one outstanding records invoice as “a one-time waiver, not a change in our position,” and proposed an addendum setting $95 an hour with a one-hour minimum.

Tran moved to refund Metcalf’s fees. The motion passed unanimously; Allen went on to ask Metcalf whether his request had been fulfilled, and Metcalf said it had not.

During the item, Heather Ethridge told commissioners that Stronghold, as a private company, cannot legally bill anyone for records requests. She also said maps for some local cemeteries were destroyed in a house fire and that, as she had been told, two cemeteries cannot sell plots because the register of deeds office will not accept copies of maps or deeds. She said the register of deeds office should start accepting cemetery deeds. Motley said the commission would take it under advisement.

Health insurance work session set

Benefits broker Don Doherty and a colleague, Jeremy Bowman, presented renewal options for the employee health plan. Doherty said Blue Cross Blue Shield’s renewal of the current plan is an increase of about 14.71% and UnitedHealthcare’s is about 11%, while UnitedHealthcare’s two high-deductible plans with health savings accounts came in about 4.95% and 6.78% below the current cost. He said self-funding the plan would likely require 10% to 15% more funding and suggested a separate meeting if the county wants to consider it. He cautioned that paying employees to leave the county plan can drive up costs for those who stay and may lead to having the county’s policy cancelled.

Milburn-Kee, who has proposed a flat county contribution and extra pay for employees who do not use the county’s insurance, said at least 25 eligible employees are not enrolled, and that the county gives about $1,700 a month toward coverage for 17 employees with dependents and $925 a month for employee-only coverage. Bowman walked through six contribution scenarios, including flat county contributions of $1,100, $1,200 and $1,300 a month that Milburn-Kee had sent.

Motley said he would not support raising premiums for employees with families. “I will never punish people for wanting to insure their children,” he said. “Having a vote of the majority, that’s the tyranny of the majority.” Milburn-Kee replied, “I think it’s giving an equal amount to everyone.”

Motley said he had received the broker’s figures only that afternoon. Commissioners scheduled a short meeting for 4:30 p.m. next Monday, Nov. 16, limited to routine items, followed by a work session on benefits at 5 p.m. Milburn-Kee asked that employees have a chance to share their views privately in the week before the meeting, and Lipscomb said she would reach them through department heads before then.

Other business

The agenda for the meeting is here.

Exit mobile version